|
International Conference
"Why has impacts assessment research not made more of a
difference?"
4-7 February, 2002, Meliá Confort Hotel, San
José, Costa Rica
Detailed Program
Monday, February 4, 2002
|
Opening
address
|
New science brings hope for people and the environment
|
|
Timothy
Reeves (CIMMYT) |
|
Keynote
speech
|
Impacts assessment: Why should we care?
|
|
Alex McCalla
(University of California at Davis) |
|
10:30 AM – 11:00 AM
|
| Coffee Break |
|
12:30 PM - 1:30 PM
|
| Lunch |
|
1:30 PM – 3:30 PM |
|
3:30 PM -
4:00 PM
|
| Coffee Break |
|
4:00 PM – 5:30 PM |
|
|
Discussion Session 1 |
|
1. Donor Perspectives
|
|
|
One
important group of users of impacts assessment studies are the people who
make decisions about the allocation of research funding. Funding agencies
increasingly demand accountability from researchers, usually including
concrete evidence that investments in research are paying off. In this
session, a panel of donor agency representatives describe the types of
information that funding agencies need to make research funding decisions.
The panel will then engage the audience in a discussion designed to
explore how results of impacts studies can be more effectively
communicated to inform the various constituencies that influence funding
for research and development.
|
|
Chairperson: |
Jim Ryan
(Australian
National University, Canberra)
|
|
Panelists: |
Stephan Krall
(Gesellschaft Fur
Technische Zusammenarbeit-GTZ)
|
|
Rodney
Cooke (International Fund for Agricultural Development-IFAD)
Presentation
|
|
Dana
Dalrymple (US Agency for International Development-USAID)
Presentation
|
|
7:00 PM – 10:30 PM
|
| Opening Reception |
Tuesday, February 5, 2002
|
10:30 AM – 11:00 AM
|
| Coffee Break |
|
11:00
AM –
12:30 PM
|
|
12:30 PM - 1:30 PM
|
| Lunch |
|
1:30 PM – 3:30 PM
|
|
3:30 PM -
4:00 PM
|
| Coffee Break |
|
4:00 PM – 5:30 PM |
|
|
Discussion Session
2 |
|
2.
Media Perspectives
|
|
Impact
studies often reveal issues of great potential interest to the general
public and to policy makers in developing and developed countries, but
these issues are rarely communicated in a compelling manner outside a
narrow community of academics and development professionals. How can the
results of impact studies be communicated more widely? In this session, a
panel of distinguished journalists share their experiences and offer
insights into how stories related to impact assessment can be communicated
effectively to policy makers, opinion leaders, and the general public.
|
|
Chairperson: |
Timothy
Reeves (CIMMYT)
|
|
Panelists: |
Barbara Rose
(Future Harvest)
Presentation
|
|
Gideon Lichfield (The
Economist)
|
|
G. Venkataramani
(The
Hindu) Presentation
|
Wednesday, February
6, 2002
|
10:30
AM -
11:00 AM
|
| Coffee Break |
|
11:00
AM –
12:30 PM
|
|
12:30 PM - 1:30 PM
|
| Lunch |
|
1:30 PM – 3:30 PM
|
|
3:30 PM -
4:00 PM
|
| Coffee Break |
Thursday, February 7, 2002
6. Benefits of Genetic Resources
Conservation |
|
Chairperson: |
Jamie
Watts (IPGRI) |
|
PA6.1 |
Economic costs and benefits of a participatory project
to conserve maize landraces on farms
|
|
|
Melinda Smale (International Food Policy Research
Institute-IFPRI), Mauricio
Bellon, Javier Aguirre, Jorge Mendoza,
Ana Maria Solano, Rafael Martinez, and Alejandro Ramirez (CIMMYT)
|
|
PA6.2 |
The distribution of benefits from public international
germplasm banks: The case of beans in Latin America |
|
|
Oswaldo Voysest,
Nancy Johnson, and Doug Pachico (International
Center for Tropical Agriculture-CIAT)
|
|
PA6.3 |
Endowing
future harvests: The long-term costs of conserving genetic resources at
the CGIAR centers |
|
|
Philip Pardey (University of Minnesota), Brian Wright (University
of California – Berkeley), and Bonwoo Koo (International Food
Policy Research Institute-IFPRI)
|
|
12:30 PM - 1:30 PM
|
| Lunch |
|
1:30 PM – 3:30 PM |
|
|
Contributed Papers Sessions
10, 11 & 12 |
10. Non-Conventional Approaches to
Impacts Assessment: Institutionalist Perspectives |
|
Chairperson: |
Simeon Ehui
(International
Livestock Research Institute-ILRI) |
|
C10.1 |
Can impact analysis be used for research evaluation? |
|
|
Javier Ekboir
(CIMMYT)
|
|
C10.2 |
An evaluation approach for achieving and attributing impact
for INRM and IPM |
|
|
Boru Douthwaite (International Institute of Tropical
Agriculture-IITA), Thomas Kuby, and Steffen Schultz (Deutsche
Gesellschaft Fur Technische Zusammenarbeit-GTZ)
|
|
C10.3 |
From measuring impact to learning institutional
lessons: An
innovation systems perspective on improving the management of
international agricultural research |
|
|
Andrew Hall
(International Crop Research Institute for Semi Arid
Tropics-ICRISAT), Rasheed Sulaiman, V., (National Centre for
Agricultural Economics and Policy Research-NCAEPR), Norman Clark
(University of Strathclyde) and Yoganand B., (Socio-Economics and Policy
Program-International Crop Research Institute for Semi Arid Tropics-ICRISAT)
|
|
C10.4 |
Disciplines, institutions and organizations: Impact
assessment in context |
|
|
Rajeswari Raina
(National Institute of
Science, Technology and Development Studies-NISTADS)
|
|
3:30 PM -
4:00 PM
|
| Coffee Break |
|