“You can see that the seeds are
not set deep enough to access residual soil moisture,” says
a man with a white, wide-brimmed hat. “That means we have
to adjust the implement a bit.” The speaker, Fernando Delgado,
is supervisor of CIMMYT’s wheat research station at Toluca
in central Mexico, and ironically a man maize farmers near the station
and in other parts of Mexico look to for advice on conservation
agriculture (CA). With his companion, CIMMYT cropping systems management
specialist Bram Govaerts, and his field assistants, Delgado set
to work to adjust the seeder, explaining each of the steps involved.
On this occasion, rather than farmers, Delgado and
Govaerts’ audience comprised agricultural experts, from both
the public and the private sectors, from key Mexican farming states
such as Durango, Guanajuato, Hidalgo, Jalisco, and Mexico. They
were there for a three-day workshop on CA for rainfed maize cropping
systems. In the group were representatives from the state of Mexico
agricultural research organization, ICAMEX; from SEDAGRO, the secretariat
of agricultural development for the state; from Mexico’s national
agricultural research institute, INIFAP; and university professors
and students. There were also representatives from the private seed
companies Monsanto, Aspros, and Tropico Seeds, and from the milling
and pasta-making company La Moderna. After a day of theoretical
discussions, all were rapt in the demonstration of direct seeding
into crop residues and unplowed soils.
“We’ve worked with farmers, but this is
a different level and a diverse group from many different parts
of the Republic,” said Bram Govaerts, who organized the course.
“We want to train researchers, machinery manufacturers, extension
agents, and representatives of seed companies, and then pass on
to them the work of disseminating conservation agriculture, once
things get rolling.”
Wresting straw from ravenous
sheep
“The principles of CA are universal and sound easy,”
says Govaerts. “You eliminate plowing, keep crop residues
on the soil, and use suitable crop rotations.” Proven benefits
to farmers include significant cost and time savings, more stable
yields over the medium-to-long term, improved soil structure and
health (with reduced erosion), and better use of soil moisture and
precipitation. Yet CA has been slow to catch on in Mexico, despite
looming crises of soil degradation and water scarcity in agricultural
areas.
To begin with, the culture of the plow—the perennial
symbol of agriculture itself—is hard to break. Other issues
include the risk-averse nature of rainfed maize farmers, who as
a rule work relatively small holdings and eke out harvests using
few inputs and under difficult conditions. Moreover, CA principles
may be simple, but applying them in real life can be complex and
may require considerable experimentation and fine-tuning, as the
day’s direct seeding demonstration showed.
But the biggest constraint to adoption in rainfed
maize cropping systems worldwide is competition for crop residues
after grain is harvested. “Keeping some residues on the soil
is essential for conservation agriculture,” says Govaerts.
“They add organic matter, guard against erosion, and capture
and retain moisture, among other useful functions. In fact, our
long-term studies show that if you practice zero-tillage continuously
without retaining any residues, after about five years the bottom
suddenly drops out of your cropping system and crop yields plummet.”
Yet, livestock and other animals are major components
of rainfed cropping systems, and crop residues have enormous value
as forage to keep them healthy and productive. In many rural communities
in developing countries, tradition allows animals to roam free after
harvest and graze at will, and little if any residues are left.
Plowing in residues might solve the problem, but CIMMYT studies
also show that there is much less benefit from the residues that
way.
“I’ve been retaining residues for the
last five years or so,” says workshop participant Fermín
Hernández, a farmer and agronomist who runs an office in
Hidalgo state that sells seed and inputs and provides technical
advice to other farmers. “I have no choice but to plow them
in, because if I leave them on the surface, other people come at
night and steal them, even though my land is fenced in. The temptation
is just too strong; they say: ‘those residues would be great
for my sheep, and you’ve got lots anyway!’ ”

There was a demonstration of direct-seeding
of maize in Toluca's rock-hard soils. Participants checked
the spacing and depth of seeds, partly to make sure they were
near residual moisture. |
The future of agriculture
Delgado has been promoting resource-conserving practices with farmers
for eight years. In the beginning, CA was a way for him to save
money on Toluca Station operations because it required less water,
fuel, and machinery passes. Now, he visits schools to educate children
about CA and gives presentations to upwards of 1,000 farmers a year.
He listens carefully to questions from the course participants and
has an easy way of relating to the group. “Conservation agriculture
is the future,” he says. “As well as the environmental
benefits, it makes farming more sustainable. If farmers use well-timed
herbicides and do proper crop rotations, they can actually improve
their yields.”
The course participants learned about how CA is being
used on experiment stations and around the world, its impact on
plant-soil systems, pest and weed control, zero-tillage and sowing
maize on permanent beds, and prototypes of machinery that can be
used for direct seeding. Participants also interacted with local
farmers to learn from their experiences applying CA principles.
“I’ve had no experience in direct seeding,
so this course was an opportunity for me to come listen to the experts,”
said Juan José García, who works for INIFAP in seed
production. “Bram and Fernando have very good ideas, and a
lot of knowledge and experience. From here I can learn from them
and take these ideas back to the farmers.”
For the past five years, García has been working
to get farmers to plant in permanent raised beds by doing demonstrations
and comparison plots. “It’s a challenge because many
of them don’t believe it will work until they see it. Also,
a lot of the young men have gone to the United States and that leaves
the older generation that is less open to change and to new ideas.”
Still, García is optimistic about the possibility
of spreading resource-conserving practices. “We can create
new projects with the institutions where I live and adapt the details
of implementation for farmers there. This is a long-term project,
but we’ve got to start somewhere.”
Govaerts is positive about the role the Toluca station
can play in spreading conservation agriculture.
“We want to build out a central Mexico ‘cropping
systems hub,’ ” he says. “The idea is to have
a focal point where all actors of the production system—farmers,
scientists, policy-makers, machine builders, seed and fertilizer
retailers, private companies, media, etc.—can work together,
resolve issues, make the technology work, and then extend it to
others.”
"We need for all the significant players to work
together to give agriculture in Mexico a boost,” says Govaerts.
“The goal is for a sustainable system that’s also profitable,
because activities that are good for the environment won’t
be applied by farmers unless they’re profitable. Conservation
agriculture can have this special combination of profitability and
sustainability.”
For more information: Bram Govaerts, Cropping
Systems Management Specialist (b.govaerts@cgiar.org)
You might also be interested in the following
reports on CIMMYT work in conservation agriculture:
Bringing
Conservation Agriculture Home to Mexico
Clarion
Call to Conservation in Mexico
Stemming
the loss of African soils’ life blood
Zero-tillage:
Averting dry wells and depleted soils in South Asia
|